Pacers vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats & Full Game Breakdown

Untitled design 2025 06 04T225754.845

The Pacers vs Cleveland Cavaliers match player stats tell the story of a high-stakes playoff series filled with drama, comebacks, and breakout performances. In Game 5, the Pacers sealed a 114-105 victory, eliminating the Cavaliers and advancing to the Eastern Conference Finals. Indiana’s resilience and balanced attack outmatched the Cavaliers’ star-dependent offense, especially in the closing stages. This detailed breakdown explores individual and team stats, highlighting how the Pacers overcame adversity to claim the series.

Who Dominated the Court for the Pacers?

Tyrese Haliburton took charge for the Pacers, scoring 31 points and dishing out eight assists. He was aggressive from the start and maintained his tempo throughout the game. Pascal Siakam added 21 points, proving his value in clutch situations. Andrew Nembhard continued to impress with 18 points. Aaron Nesmith contributed a double-double, tallying 13 points and 13 rebounds. These performances showcased the Pacers’ depth, with multiple players stepping up when it mattered most.

Cavaliers’ Top Performers and Game Stats

Despite the loss, Donovan Mitchell led all scorers with 35 points, showing grit and determination. However, support from the rest of the roster was limited. Darius Garland and Max Strus both struggled from three-point range, combining for 0-of-12. Cleveland’s lack of efficiency hurt their chances, and they couldn’t match Indiana’s scoring bursts. While Mitchell tried to carry the load, the Cavs’ offensive execution and defensive lapses were exposed throughout the game.

Team Comparison: Indiana Pacers vs Cleveland Cavaliers

The Pacers displayed better overall chemistry and execution. They shared the ball more effectively, ending with 28 team assists. Indiana shot better from the field, particularly during crucial stretches. The Cavaliers, meanwhile, had trouble maintaining consistent scoring. Indiana’s defense limited Cleveland’s effectiveness, forcing difficult shots and capitalizing on fast-break opportunities. In almost every statistical category — shooting percentage, ball movement, and transition play — the Pacers held the edge.

Shooting Accuracy and Field Goals

Indiana’s shooting was both efficient and timely. They started the game hot, especially from beyond the arc. Haliburton’s sharp shooting and Siakam’s mid-range game opened up the floor. By comparison, the Cavaliers struggled to find rhythm. Their field goal percentage remained low due to poor shot selection and tight defense from Indiana. The disparity in shot-making ability made a notable difference in the final result and reflected each team’s offensive discipline.

Assists, Rebounds, and Team Synergy

Indiana’s team-oriented approach resulted in more assists and better spacing on the floor. Their ball movement allowed for open shots, particularly from three-point range. The Pacers also out-rebounded Cleveland, especially on the defensive glass, limiting the Cavs’ second-chance points. Nesmith and Turner controlled the boards, while the guards boxed out well. This team synergy translated into momentum and scoring runs that Cleveland failed to match.

Standout Players of the Game

Tyrese Haliburton was the standout performer with his all-around contribution of 31 points and eight assists. On defense, Myles Turner made a significant impact by altering shots and recording multiple blocks. Pascal Siakam’s steady scoring gave Indiana another weapon. For the Cavaliers, Donovan Mitchell’s 35-point performance was the only consistent highlight, though it wasn’t enough. The lack of scoring help around Mitchell made it easier for Indiana to focus their defense.

Bench Impact: How Substitutes Changed the Game

Indiana’s bench came in ready to contribute. Obi Toppin added energy and scored crucial points in transition. Jarace Walker and Thomas Bryant helped maintain momentum during key stretches. Their ability to hold the lead while starters rested was essential. On the other hand, Cleveland’s bench failed to make a significant impact. The lack of production and defensive lapses from their substitutes left a gap Indiana took full advantage of during rotations.

Game-Changing Moments and Turning Points

The third quarter of Game 5 featured a key momentum shift. With the game still close, Haliburton hit back-to-back three-pointers, sparking a Pacers run. Indiana’s defense tightened, forcing turnovers and limiting the Cavs to contested jumpers. Another turning point came in the second quarter, when Indiana’s second unit extended the lead, catching Cleveland off guard. These moments were crucial in sealing the win and reflected Indiana’s ability to stay composed under pressure.

Three-Point Shooting: Who Nailed It?

The Pacers were lethal from deep, especially Haliburton who hit six three-pointers. Their shooters spread the floor and created space for slashers like Siakam. Indiana’s accuracy from long range was a key difference in this game. In contrast, the Cavaliers’ three-point shooting was abysmal. Garland and Strus couldn’t find their rhythm, and the team as a whole shot poorly. That lack of perimeter success hampered Cleveland’s ability to mount a comeback.

Foul Trouble and Turnover Analysis

Indiana played disciplined basketball, avoiding unnecessary fouls. This allowed their starters to stay on the court longer and control the tempo. They also limited their turnovers, playing clean and precise offense. Cleveland, however, committed 14 turnovers, many of which led directly to fast-break points. These miscues, combined with foul trouble for key defenders, created defensive mismatches and opened scoring opportunities for Indiana’s versatile lineup.

Final Quarter Highlights: Who Stepped Up?

In the final quarter, Tyrese Haliburton took full control. He orchestrated the offense, finding teammates and taking clutch shots. Siakam hit two timely mid-range jumpers that halted Cleveland runs. Myles Turner blocked key attempts in the paint, keeping the Cavs at bay. Cleveland tried to mount a comeback, but missed shots and defensive lapses kept them from closing the gap. Indiana’s composure in the fourth quarter proved to be the deciding factor.

Key Stat Lines and Box Score Insights

Tyrese Haliburton’s stat line of 31 points and 8 assists stood out. Pascal Siakam added 21 points, and Aaron Nesmith’s 13 points and 13 rebounds provided balance. Donovan Mitchell’s 35 points led the Cavs, but no other player cracked the 20-point mark. Indiana’s field goal percentage hovered around 48%, while the Cavs were stuck at 44%. The disparity in rebounds, assists, and turnovers underscored Indiana’s dominance on both ends of the court.

Head-to-Head: Historic Rivalry Between Pacers and Cavs

This series added another chapter to the rivalry between the two franchises. While Cleveland has often had the upper hand in past matchups, this playoff run saw a shift. The Pacers showcased a well-rounded team capable of competing at a high level. Winning four of the five games, Indiana made a statement. The head-to-head narrative now favors the Pacers in recent history, and this win may mark the beginning of a new era in the Eastern Conference.

Injury Reports and Player Conditions

Donovan Mitchell played through an ankle issue, which clearly affected his explosiveness at times. The Cavaliers were also without key depth due to injuries, forcing extended minutes for less experienced players. Indiana remained relatively healthy, and their full rotation was a major advantage. The Pacers’ ability to manage player minutes while staying competitive gave them an edge as the series progressed.

Coaching Strategies and Timeouts Breakdown

Coach Rick Carlisle’s adjustments throughout the game were timely and effective. His use of timeouts to stop Cavaliers’ runs and his strategic substitutions kept Indiana in control. Offensively, he emphasized ball movement and spacing, which opened up clean looks for shooters. Cleveland’s coaching staff failed to counter these strategies effectively. Late-game decisions and a stagnant offense put extra pressure on their stars without delivering results.

Fan Reactions and Arena Energy

Fans at Gainbridge Fieldhouse brought high energy, especially during Indiana’s runs. The crowd amplified the team’s intensity and created a challenging environment for the Cavaliers. Online, social media buzz focused on Haliburton’s leadership and the Pacers’ surprising playoff surge. Many praised their teamwork, grit, and ability to finish games. The fanbase is now energized as the team advances with momentum on their side.

You May Also Like: Portland Trail Blazers vs Okc Thunder Match Player Stats & Game Recap

FAQs

Who was the top scorer in the Pacers vs Cavaliers Game 5?
Tyrese Haliburton scored 31 points for the Pacers, while Donovan Mitchell led the Cavaliers with 35.

Did the Cavaliers have injury concerns?
Yes, Donovan Mitchell played through an ankle injury, and Cleveland was also short on bench depth.

What’s next for the Pacers?
The Pacers advance to the Eastern Conference Finals to face their next opponent, aiming for a Finals berth.

How did three-point shooting impact the game?
Indiana’s accuracy from deep gave them a crucial edge, while Cleveland’s poor shooting cost them momentum.

One thought on “Pacers vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats & Full Game Breakdown

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *